Its professional product reviews and recommendations book writers within conclusion and you may make sure composed studies are legitimate, rigorous, and you can reputable. Writers see peer writers due to the fact of their inside the-breadth knowledge of the niche amount otherwise types of the work he’s asked to test. So it possibilities are priceless and you may irreplaceable. Fellow writers is accountable for the accuracy and you can opinions conveyed in the its profile, plus the fellow comment techniques operates to your an idea off mutual believe between people, reviewers and you may editors. Even after fast advances, generative AI tools possess significant limits: they may be able lack upwards-to-go out degree and may also make nonsensical, biased or untrue information. Manuscripts may were sensitive and painful or proprietary recommendations which should maybe not be mutual outside of the peer remark processes. For these reasons i query one to, while Springer Nature examines delivering the peer reviewers having usage of secure AI gadgets, peer writers dont publish manuscripts on generative AI systems.
If any part of the review of says built in the manuscript was in in any manner backed by an enthusiastic AI equipment, we inquire fellow reviewers so you’re able to state the effective use of such as equipment transparently about fellow review declaration.
Citations
Look content and you will low-search content (elizabeth.grams. Thoughts, Feedback, and you can Statements blogs) have to cite appropriate and you will associated literary works to get new claims made. Continuously mind-ticket, paired work certainly numerous people to help you collectively thinking-mention, gratuitous and you will way too many citation regarding content authored on record in order to that paper could have been registered, and every other form of solution control are poor.
Violation control will result in the content getting denied, that can end up being advertised so you can authors’ establishments. Also, people efforts because of the fellow-reviewers otherwise editors to remind such as methods shall be advertised of the article writers toward publisher.
- Experts should think about the second guidelines when preparing the manuscript:
- One statement about manuscript that utilizes exterior resources of pointers (we.e. perhaps not the latest authors’ very own the fresh ideas or results otherwise general education) should explore a pass.
- Article authors will be end citing derivations of new performs. Particularly, they have to cite the initial works in lieu of a review blog post you to alludes to exclusive works.
- People is to make sure that their citations are specific (i.elizabeth. they need to ensure the violation supporting brand new declaration made in its manuscript and cannot misrepresent an alternative functions because of the pointing out they if it generally does not contain the part the newest article writers need to generate).
- Article writers ought not to cite present that they have maybe not read.
- Authors ought not to preferentially mention their particular otherwise their friends’, peers’, or institution’s products.
- Article authors will be avoid mentioning work entirely from just one country.
- People should not use an excessive level of citations to support one-point.
- Ideally, authors would be to mention source which have gone through fellow remark where it is possible to.
- Article writers should not mention advertising otherwise advertorial thing.
Preprint sharing and you will pass
BMC magazines prompt posting from preprints of first browse manuscripts for the preprint server of one’s authors’ choice, authors’ or organization other sites, and you will open communication ranging from experts whether or not into community preprint server or preprint commenting programs.
Preprints try identified as an Pakistanais femme author’s variety of a study manuscript prior to official fellow opinion in the a diary, that’s deposited for the a community server (given that demonstrated for the Preprints for the lives sciences. Research 352, 899901; 2016); preprints is generally published anytime inside peer remark process. Send out-of preprints is not felt earlier guide and does not threaten planning from the BMC journals. Manuscripts published towards the preprint machine will not be taken into consideration whenever determining the improvement provided with a study at issue in the good BMC journal.
BMC enjoys partnered with Research Square ( BMC possess a majority need for Look Rectangular) to include When you look at the Comment, a journal-incorporated provider to own preprint sharing, supporting article authors all over every communities i are designed to express the browse very early. Experts submission to a few BMC periodicals are also able to publicly express information about the peer review using Inside Remark. General facts about Within the Feedback from the BMC therefore the Browse Rectangular preprint platform can be acquired right here this is where .